DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009169030-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-06-23

000126497

Contested design: 009169030-0001

EUDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 009169030-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Deming Liuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Beixing Town, Keshan County, Provinz Heilongjiang, China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Xiaoxiu Ding

China (CN)

Yingcheng, Hubei, China

Represented by

Sach & Associates

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1⚠ rejected as evidence

thumbnail image of a stroller set from an Amazon listing

ASIN B 096 5DM TBN · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2021-05-29

Web disclosureD2

thumbnail image of a stroller set from an Amazon listing

ASIN B 096 5DM TBN · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2021-05-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier stroller designs disclosed on Amazon before the filing date.
  • The holder argued that the contested design differed in features such as belts, buckles, canopy, wheels, basket frame, and closure details.
  • The Division rejected D1 as insufficiently proven because the submitted extracts did not conclusively establish the disclosed design on the cited webpage and date.
  • The Division accepted D2 as properly disclosed on Amazon on 2021-05-29 and found the differences too minor to alter the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENŃ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.12

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128