Invalidity · first instance · 2020-02-04
000108147
Contested design: 006647830-0001
Outcome
The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee will not be refunded.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.
CostsNot specified
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Vahdet Akardenizvia PDF extraction
Germany (DE)
Schaberfeld 22, 42659 Solingen, Germany
Holder · RCD owner
Ejoy law Group
United Kingdom (GB)
185 Ashfield Avenue, Atherton Manchester M46 0HD, United Kingdom
Prior art cited (1)
earlier RCD cited by the applicant
RCD No 0036213820028
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity of RCD No 006647830-0001 under Article 25(1)(b) CDR for alleged lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 003621382-0028.
- ›No holder observations or representation are recorded; the decision turned on whether the filing met the admissibility requirements.
- ›The Division found the application contained no supporting evidence, facts or arguments and therefore did not comply with Article 28(1)(b)(vi) CDIR.
- ›Because the applicant failed to cure that deficiency within the time limit set by the Office, the application was rejected as inadmissible and the fee was not refunded.
Deciding panel
- MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE
- MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
- MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000117049 vs Ludwik Styl Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Spółka komandytowa w restrukturyzacji | 2022-03-16 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 7 |
| 000113382 vs Stern GmbH & Co. KG | 2021-08-11 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 7 |
| 000107999 vs ANJI WEIYU FURNITURE CO., LTD. | 2020-06-25 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 7 |
| 000105839 vs Next Retail Limited | 2020-04-06 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 7 |
| 000105819 vs Next Retail Limited | 2020-04-02 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 7 |
| 000105820 vs Made.com Design Limited | 2020-03-13 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 7 |
| 000131404 vs Jiahe Lin | 2026-05-21 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 5 |
| 000128557 vs Washtower IP B.V. | 2026-05-19 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 5 |