DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005666146-0017

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-06

000105839

Contested design: 005666146-0017

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 005666146-0017 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Sourceable Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

91-93 Great Eastern Street, City of London EC2A 3HZ, United Kingdom

Represented by

Gunnercooke LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Made.com Design Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

5 Singer Street, London EC2A 4BQ, United Kingdom

Represented by

Bird & Bird LLP

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

chair shown in Instagram post

https://instagram.com/p/BnTr70vligG/ · Instagram · disclosed 2018-09-04

Web disclosureD2

chair shown in Instagram post

https://instagram.com/p/BnqGkv-jFSU/ · Instagram · disclosed 2018-09-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over two earlier chair designs disclosed in Instagram posts dated 4 and 13 September 2018.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, argued the prior designs were insufficiently shown, and maintained that the contested design had individual character in a crowded armchair design corpus.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted both Instagram posts as prior disclosures under Article 7 and found the images sufficient for comparison.
  • Despite some shared features, the Division found major differences in armrests, thickness, proportions, and overall appearance, so the contested RCD produced a different overall impression.
  • The application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000117049

vs Ludwik Styl Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Spółka komandytowa w restrukturyzacji

2022-03-16Art 25(1)(b)067
000113382

vs Stern GmbH & Co. KG

2021-08-11Art 25(1)(b)067
000107999

vs ANJI WEIYU FURNITURE CO., LTD.

2020-06-25Art 25(1)(b)067
000105819

vs Next Retail Limited

2020-04-02Art 25(1)(b)067
000105820

vs Made.com Design Limited

2020-03-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000108147

vs Ejoy law Group

2020-02-04Art 25(1)(b)067
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)065
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)065