DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005942521-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-06-25

000107999

Contested design: 005942521-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0059425210002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Eucashbox Logistik GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Am Kielsgraben 10, 40789 Monheim, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Anji Weiyu Furniture Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 280, West Sunlight Road, Anji County, Zhejiang Dipu 313300, People's Republic of China

Represented by

A.BRE.MAR. S.R.L.

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

chair offered on amazon.de

ASIN B07K71F8VX · amazon.de · disclosed 2018-11-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on an Amazon listing for chair design ASIN B07K71F8VX allegedly disclosed on 6 November 2018.
  • The holder argued the evidence should be disregarded, the claimed priority date defeated the cited disclosure, and the contested design was neither identical nor lacking individual character.
  • The Division found the claimed priority invalid because the earlier Chinese design was in black and white while the contested RCD was registered in colour, so the relevant date was the filing date of 21 December 2018.
  • The Division nevertheless held that the Amazon materials and link were insufficient, taken alone or together, to prove disclosure of the prior design under Article 7.
  • The application was rejected as unfounded, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000117049

vs Ludwik Styl Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Spółka komandytowa w restrukturyzacji

2022-03-16Art 25(1)(b)067
000113382

vs Stern GmbH & Co. KG

2021-08-11Art 25(1)(b)067
000105839

vs Next Retail Limited

2020-04-06Art 25(1)(b)067
000105819

vs Next Retail Limited

2020-04-02Art 25(1)(b)067
000105820

vs Made.com Design Limited

2020-03-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000108147

vs Ejoy law Group

2020-02-04Art 25(1)(b)067
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)065
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)065