DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004383495-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-03-13

000105820

Contested design: 004383495-0005

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application against the contested RCD is rejected.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 004383495-0005 is rejected.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Sourceable Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

91-93 Great Eastern Street, City of London EC2A 3HZ, United Kingdom

Represented by

Gunnercooke llp

Holder · RCD owner

Made.com Design Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

5 Singer Street, London EC2A 4BQ, United Kingdom

Represented by

BIRD & BIRD LLP

Prior art cited (3)

PublicationAnnex A

'Mad Queen' chair

https://howtospendit.ft.com/house-garden/120811-velvets-plushrenaissance · Financial Times / howtospendit.ft.com · disclosed 2016-12-29

CatalogAnnex B

'Modtro' chair

2016 Scandinavian Design autumn winter collection catalogue

Web disclosureAnnex C⚠ rejected as evidence

'Mimi' chair

https://www.swooneditions.com/mimi-light-grey-mid-century-armchair · swooneditions.com

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant claimed the armchair lacked individual character over the earlier 'Mad Queen', 'Modtro' and 'Mimi' chair designs.
  • Holder disputed disclosure of all three prior designs and argued the crowded armchair design corpus made the differences decisive.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of 'Mad Queen' and 'Modtro' but rejected 'Mimi' for insufficient dating evidence.
  • Given the crowded prior art and the visible differences in backrest, base, decoration and undisclosed views, the contested RCD created a different overall impression.
  • The application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000117049

vs Ludwik Styl Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Spółka komandytowa w restrukturyzacji

2022-03-16Art 25(1)(b)067
000113382

vs Stern GmbH & Co. KG

2021-08-11Art 25(1)(b)067
000107999

vs ANJI WEIYU FURNITURE CO., LTD.

2020-06-25Art 25(1)(b)067
000105839

vs Next Retail Limited

2020-04-06Art 25(1)(b)067
000105819

vs Next Retail Limited

2020-04-02Art 25(1)(b)067
000108147

vs Ejoy law Group

2020-02-04Art 25(1)(b)067
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)065
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)065