Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-02
000105819
Contested design: 005666146-0008
Outcome
The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must pay the holder’s costs fixed at EUR 400.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 005666146-0008 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.
CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Sourceable Limitedvia PDF extraction
United Kingdom (GB)
91-93 Great Eastern Street, City of London EC2A 3HZ, United Kingdom
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
Made.com Design Limitedvia PDF extraction
United Kingdom (GB)
5 Singer Street, London EC2A 4BQ, United Kingdom
Represented by
Prior art cited (3)
table design shown in UKIPO database screenshots
UK design No 6 010 512 · UKIPO online database
THE NICOLE OCCASIONAL TABLE
https://twitter.com · Twitter · disclosed 2014-10-09
table design shown in Instagram post and annakarlin.com screenshot
https://www.instagram.com · Instagram · disclosed 2018-05-19
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over three earlier table designs, relying on a UK design filing and web disclosures from Twitter and Instagram.
- ›The holder disputed disclosure of all prior designs, argued the prior art for dining tables was crowded, and maintained the contested design created a different overall impression.
- ›The Division rejected D1 because no publication date was shown, but accepted D2 and D3 as prior internet disclosures before the filing date.
- ›Despite some shared table features, the Division found significant differences in the tabletop, metallic connector, base shape, materials, and overall appearance.
- ›The contested RCD retained individual character, so the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.
Deciding panel
- MemberNatascha GALPERIN
- MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
- MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000117049 vs Ludwik Styl Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Spółka komandytowa w restrukturyzacji | 2022-03-16 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 7 |
| 000113382 vs Stern GmbH & Co. KG | 2021-08-11 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 7 |
| 000107999 vs ANJI WEIYU FURNITURE CO., LTD. | 2020-06-25 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 7 |
| 000105839 vs Next Retail Limited | 2020-04-06 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 7 |
| 000105820 vs Made.com Design Limited | 2020-03-13 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 7 |
| 000108147 vs Ejoy law Group | 2020-02-04 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 7 |
| 000131404 vs Jiahe Lin | 2026-05-21 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 5 |
| 000128557 vs Washtower IP B.V. | 2026-05-19 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 06 | 5 |