DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003490622-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-16

000117049

Contested design: 003490622-0004

CDR

Outcome

Application inadmissible

The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee will not be refunded.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.

CostsNo costs order

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Klaus W. Göcke Büro für Gestaltungvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Magnolienweg 25, 32760 Detmold, Germany

Represented by

D & R Anwaltskanzlei

Holder · RCD owner

Ludwik Styl Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Spółka komandytowa w restrukturyzacji

Poland (PL)

ul. Wojska Polskiego 10, 64-610 Rogoźno, Poland

Represented by

Kondrat & Partners

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 28(1)(b)(iv)Article 28(1)(b)(vi)Article 28(1)(c)(i)Article 1(1)(b)Article 30(1)Article 30(2)Article 52

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity of Community design No 003490622-0004 under Article 25(1)(b) CDR.
  • The holder’s position on the merits is not discussed; the decision turned on admissibility defects in the application.
  • The Division found the applicant did not provide its legal form for proper identification and did not submit facts, evidence, or arguments supporting the pleaded invalidity grounds.
  • Because those deficiencies were not remedied within the Office deadline, the application was rejected as inadmissible and the fee was not refunded.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.0506.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000113382

vs Stern GmbH & Co. KG

2021-08-11Art 25(1)(b)067
000107999

vs ANJI WEIYU FURNITURE CO., LTD.

2020-06-25Art 25(1)(b)067
000105839

vs Next Retail Limited

2020-04-06Art 25(1)(b)067
000105819

vs Next Retail Limited

2020-04-02Art 25(1)(b)067
000105820

vs Made.com Design Limited

2020-03-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000108147

vs Ejoy law Group

2020-02-04Art 25(1)(b)067
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)065
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)065