DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005291440-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-21

000110921

Contested design: 005291440-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0052914400002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Henkel AG & Co. KGaAvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

IP Department (CLI), Henkelstrasse 67, 40589 Düsseldorf, Germany

Represented by

Jörg Schmidt

Holder · RCD owner

Bluesun Consumer Brands, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Poligono Industrial ‘El Rengle’, Calle Vilassar 5, 08302 Mataró-Barcelona, Spain

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

dosage packaging for washing agents

Community design No 0036197170004 · Community Design Bulletin · disclosed 2019-05-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(d)Article 10Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(d) based on its earlier deferred RCD for washing-agent dosage packaging, arguing the contested capsule created no different overall impression.
  • Holder argued the informed user also included cleaning professionals, designer freedom was technically constrained, the designs looked different overall, and Article 19 limited the earlier deferred RCD to copy protection before publication.
  • The Division held Article 25(1)(d) expressly covers deferred earlier RCDs, so Article 19 did not restrict this invalidity ground or the comparison standard.
  • Comparing the protected features, the Division found only minor differences in capsule outline and central space, insufficient to alter the overall impression given the designer's relatively broad freedom.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs of EUR 750 were imposed on the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.0228.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000110241

vs Dongguan Shengming Industrial Co.,Ltd

2020-07-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(d)288
000117753

vs Xinglong Mo

2022-08-04Art 25(1)(d)287
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidated286
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidated286
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidated286
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidated286
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidated286
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidated286